Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Paradigm scores higher on the research-model fit (74 vs 72). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Paradigm Institutional crypto options RFQ / block liquidity | Paradex 0% retail fees · Starknet appchain perps + USDC options |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 74 | 72 |
| Fit /10research model | 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 72 | 56 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 68 | 92 |
| Product depthresearch model | 88 | 62 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 80 | 86 |
| API quality | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | — | 0 |
| Taker bpsresearch model | — | 0 |
| Margin | mixed | on-chain |
| Settlement | usdc, coin | usdc |
| Assets | BTC, ETH | BTC, ETH, HYPE |
| RFQ / blocks | Yes | No |
| On-chain | No | Yes |
| 24h vol (edit.) | — | $8M |
| OI (edit.) | — | $120M |
| Best for | RFQ / blocks · Multi-leg structures · Institutional | Zero-fee retail options & perps · On-chain options research · Pro / API market making |
| KYC | Institutional KYC / invite | Wallet-first with geo screens |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Paradigm liquidity score 72 vs Paradex 56. Product depth 88 vs 62. RFQ/blocks: Paradigm. On-chain: — / Paradex.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Paradigm: Invitation / institutional onboarding. Paradex: US and restricted regions. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.