Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Paradigm scores higher on the research-model fit (74 vs 72). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Paradex 0% retail fees · Starknet appchain perps + USDC options | Paradigm Institutional crypto options RFQ / block liquidity |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 72 | 74 |
| Fit /10research model | 7.2 | 7.4 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 56 | 72 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 92 | 68 |
| Product depthresearch model | 62 | 88 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 86 | 80 |
| API quality | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | 0 | — |
| Taker bpsresearch model | 0 | — |
| Margin | on-chain | mixed |
| Settlement | usdc | usdc, coin |
| Assets | BTC, ETH, HYPE | BTC, ETH |
| RFQ / blocks | No | Yes |
| On-chain | Yes | No |
| 24h vol (edit.) | $8M | — |
| OI (edit.) | $120M | — |
| Best for | Zero-fee retail options & perps · On-chain options research · Pro / API market making | RFQ / blocks · Multi-leg structures · Institutional |
| KYC | Wallet-first with geo screens | Institutional KYC / invite |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Paradex liquidity score 56 vs Paradigm 72. Product depth 62 vs 88. RFQ/blocks: Paradigm. On-chain: Paradex / —.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Paradex: US and restricted regions. Paradigm: Invitation / institutional onboarding. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.