Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Deribit scores higher on the research-model fit (94 vs 76). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Deribit Benchmark crypto options venue | Derive On-chain options with long-dated + HYPE strength |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 94 | 76 |
| Fit /10research model | 9.4 | 7.6 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 98 | 70 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 78 | 76 |
| Product depthresearch model | 96 | 80 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 95 | 82 |
| API quality | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | 3 | 1 |
| Taker bpsresearch model | 3 | 4 |
| Margin | portfolio | on-chain |
| Settlement | coin, usdc | usdc |
| Assets | BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP | BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE, XRP, ADA, ZEC, CC, XAUT |
| RFQ / blocks | Yes | Yes |
| On-chain | No | Yes |
| 24h vol (edit.) | $1.2B | $45M |
| OI (edit.) | $18B | $900M |
| Best for | Long-dated · Highest liquidity · Pro desks | HYPE options · Long-dated · On-chain |
| KYC | Full KYC for fiat rails; crypto deposit flows vary by region | Wallet-first; frontend geo rules apply |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Deribit liquidity score 98 vs Derive 70. Product depth 96 vs 80. RFQ/blocks: Deribit & Derive. On-chain: — / Derive.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Deribit: US; UK retail restrictions vary. Derive: Jurisdiction-dependent frontends. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.