Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Deribit scores higher on the research-model fit (94 vs 72). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Paradex 0% retail fees · Starknet appchain perps + USDC options | Deribit Benchmark crypto options venue |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 72 | 94 |
| Fit /10research model | 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 56 | 98 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 92 | 78 |
| Product depthresearch model | 62 | 96 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 86 | 95 |
| API quality | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | 0 | 3 |
| Taker bpsresearch model | 0 | 3 |
| Margin | on-chain | portfolio |
| Settlement | usdc | coin, usdc |
| Assets | BTC, ETH, HYPE | BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP |
| RFQ / blocks | No | Yes |
| On-chain | Yes | No |
| 24h vol (edit.) | $8M | $1.2B |
| OI (edit.) | $120M | $18B |
| Best for | Zero-fee retail options & perps · On-chain options research · Pro / API market making | Long-dated · Highest liquidity · Pro desks |
| KYC | Wallet-first with geo screens | Full KYC for fiat rails; crypto deposit flows vary by region |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Paradex liquidity score 56 vs Deribit 98. Product depth 62 vs 96. RFQ/blocks: Deribit. On-chain: Paradex / —.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Paradex: US and restricted regions. Deribit: US; UK retail restrictions vary. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.