Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Derive scores higher on the research-model fit (76 vs 74). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Derive On-chain options with long-dated + HYPE strength | Paradigm Institutional crypto options RFQ / block liquidity |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 76 | 74 |
| Fit /10research model | 7.6 | 7.4 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 70 | 72 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 76 | 68 |
| Product depthresearch model | 80 | 88 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 82 | 80 |
| API quality | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | 1 | — |
| Taker bpsresearch model | 4 | — |
| Margin | on-chain | mixed |
| Settlement | usdc | usdc, coin |
| Assets | BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE, XRP, ADA, ZEC, CC, XAUT | BTC, ETH |
| RFQ / blocks | Yes | Yes |
| On-chain | Yes | No |
| 24h vol (edit.) | $45M | — |
| OI (edit.) | $900M | — |
| Best for | HYPE options · Long-dated · On-chain | RFQ / blocks · Multi-leg structures · Institutional |
| KYC | Wallet-first; frontend geo rules apply | Institutional KYC / invite |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Derive liquidity score 70 vs Paradigm 72. Product depth 80 vs 88. RFQ/blocks: Derive & Paradigm. On-chain: Derive / —.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Derive: Jurisdiction-dependent frontends. Paradigm: Invitation / institutional onboarding. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.