Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Deribit scores higher on the research-model fit (94 vs 74). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Deribit Benchmark crypto options venue | Paradigm Institutional crypto options RFQ / block liquidity |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 94 | 74 |
| Fit /10research model | 9.4 | 7.4 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 98 | 72 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 78 | 68 |
| Product depthresearch model | 96 | 88 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 95 | 80 |
| API quality | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | 3 | — |
| Taker bpsresearch model | 3 | — |
| Margin | portfolio | mixed |
| Settlement | coin, usdc | usdc, coin |
| Assets | BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP | BTC, ETH |
| RFQ / blocks | Yes | Yes |
| On-chain | No | No |
| 24h vol (edit.) | $1.2B | — |
| OI (edit.) | $18B | — |
| Best for | Long-dated · Highest liquidity · Pro desks | RFQ / blocks · Multi-leg structures · Institutional |
| KYC | Full KYC for fiat rails; crypto deposit flows vary by region | Institutional KYC / invite |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Deribit liquidity score 98 vs Paradigm 72. Product depth 96 vs 88. RFQ/blocks: Deribit & Paradigm. On-chain: — / —.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Deribit: US; UK retail restrictions vary. Paradigm: Invitation / institutional onboarding. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.