Resolving liquidity matrix...
Fees, liquidity, product flags, margin, RFQ, and editorial volume. Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking. Deribit scores higher on the research-model fit (94 vs 76). OptionsMatch does not open accounts.
Trade hops use tracked /go links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. OptionsMatch does not open accounts. We may earn a commission.
| Metric | Derive On-chain options with long-dated + HYPE strength | Deribit Benchmark crypto options venue |
|---|---|---|
| Fit scoreresearch model | 76 | 94 |
| Fit /10research model | 7.6 | 9.4 |
| Liquidityresearch model | 70 | 98 |
| Cost scoreresearch model | 76 | 78 |
| Product depthresearch model | 80 | 96 |
| Tech / APIresearch model | 82 | 95 |
| API quality | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Maker bpsresearch model | 1 | 3 |
| Taker bpsresearch model | 4 | 3 |
| Margin | on-chain | portfolio |
| Settlement | usdc | coin, usdc |
| Assets | BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE, XRP, ADA, ZEC, CC, XAUT | BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP |
| RFQ / blocks | Yes | Yes |
| On-chain | Yes | No |
| 24h vol (edit.) | $45M | $1.2B |
| OI (edit.) | $900M | $18B |
| Best for | HYPE options · Long-dated · On-chain | Long-dated · Highest liquidity · Pro desks |
| KYC | Wallet-first; frontend geo rules apply | Full KYC for fiat rails; crypto deposit flows vary by region |
| Profiles / hops |
Fit score is a research model, not a safety or “best broker” ranking.
Derive liquidity score 70 vs Deribit 98. Product depth 80 vs 96. RFQ/blocks: Derive & Deribit. On-chain: Derive / —.
Both venues enforce geo and KYC rules that change by entity. Derive: Jurisdiction-dependent frontends. Deribit: US; UK retail restrictions vary. Use country hubs for jurisdiction mapping — not legal advice.